For many countries, technology, such as smartphone apps, has become an important tool around the world.However, like many online applications, it comes with some limitations in the form of threats. Personal and civil rights, which can have long-term effects The crisis is over As a result, the app has been proven to be a responsive to virus threats. As the epidemic escalated, officials turned to technology assistance, using it immediately to monitor how the virus spread to people. The technology allows them to track who is infected and how it spreads to others.
With the reduction of restrictions and people returning to society, there will be a greater need for technology such as applications as it coordinates the response to the virus and mitigates its spread to prevent secondary protection. A number of apps are used around the world to help prevent viruses from spreading by letting users know if they have come into contact with people infected with the virus and how far away they are from people who have it. There is also a discussion on passports, a virtual immunization that will allow people to go out and about with an anonymous trackers that alert people to the presence of someone infected with the virus, such as an app. In order for these concepts to work together in harmony and to achieve their full benefits, they have to take control of our normal daily lives through technology that works on multiple networks.
In order to function and to enable the app to anonymously notify users to communicate with suspects, the solution must have access to a large amount of personal information. This includes details such as location, health history and connections between relationships they share with people and health history to successfully track their spread. So using the app is a great option, but it has its own limitations as well. The world must choose between data privacy and the speed it wants to return to normalcy. The choice lies between the protection of personal information and the efficiency of technology.
As the virus continued to spread, attention shifted from individual monitoring to in-population tracking patterns. This is evidenced by government-run social aloof advice. However, more permanent impacts will come in later stages and will force authorities to set more long-term rules for people to follow when exiting the block, which will certainly require the use of the app.
During this time, technology can be centralized and will give people a little sense of normality in their lives by letting them leave their homes. Officials will be able to monitor movements and impose restrictions.Technologies like this have already shown positive signs in countries such as South Korea after reducing the blocking measures. By using technology with smartphones, such as the latest Samsung phones, they were able to recover from shutdowns faster and relatively less from another attack, ultimately the ultimate goal.
But there are still important factors to consider when using technology that can keep a close eye on people and their movements. Human rights groups may warn that the use of technology at this level could extend for a long time in the future and lead to government manipulations, forcing the world to increase surveillance and less privacy. The battle for freedom and privacy will be a battle, and a wave of surveillance expected to allow apps to protect its residents from the virus will hold record.
Some researchers also argue that abuse of power during this time can lead to complete problems in the fight against the virus. Residents may begin to lose confidence in their governments and their entities as they feel that their personal and data are increasingly misused, which would jeopardize counter-efforts. Viruses and brought people to protests
Although many people are grappling with this technology. But there is no doubt that using a level of technology will help governments and people move around safely, slow down the spread of the virus and put an end to the block. The proposed solution for use in countries such as China and Russia is monitoring people on their smartphones. Use it as a tool to find out who they are dealing with via a Bluetooth connection as the world is slowly recovering from this epidemic. Only time will tell which technology and solutions will work best in Fighting the plague.
In the name of increasing technological innovation and improving efficiency, many governments around the world are turning to big tech companies and adopting new digital technologies to help create a dangerous new digital welfare state, according to a new Philip report. Alston, UN Reporter on Severe Poverty
Analyzing current systems in the UK and the United States, as well as 60 reports from 34 countries around the world, the report offers a stark warning that governments must reconsider their use of technology such as artificial intelligence and other technologies in their service. As Alston notes in his report, countries around the world are “Stumble like a zombie in the digital world of well-being”
The main conclusions from the report, which will be presented to the United Nations General Assembly, are that technology that should be used to help people get the vital services of the state will be used instead to: Many of these people are directly dependent on governments for their basic services and benefits, social protection, and the risk is that the use of new technologies makes it possible for the poor and vulnerable. Getting these services is difficult, not easy.
Alston, who is known to be a leading critic of the UK government for economic austerity measures taken by the Trump administration in the United States as tax cuts for the wealthy, sees a direct correlation between Application of new technologies such as artificial intelligence and systematic monitoring.